Julia MinsonEvery podcast appearance, updated as new ones drop

Julia Minson reveals her strategies for making disagreements productive. — YOU’LL LEARN — 1) The HEAR framework for productive disagreements 2) The key to avoiding a stalemate in an argument 3) Simple phrases that communicate curiosity instead of judgment Subscribe or visit AwesomeAtYourJob.com/ep1165 for clickable versions of the links below. — ABOUT JULIA — Julia Minson, from the Harvard Kennedy School, studies the psychology of disagreement and conflict. Her work focuses on how people can communicate across differences without conversations becoming hostile or unproductive. She’s the author of How to Disagree Better and studies “conversational receptiveness” — the language patterns that make people more open, collaborative, and willing to engage. • Book: How to Disagree Better • Website: DisagreeingBetter.com — RESOURCES MENTIONED IN THE SHOW — • Book: The Everlasting by Alix Harrow • Past episode: 311: Communication Secrets from FBI Kidnapping Negotiator Chris Voss See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info .

Behavioral scientist Julia Minson joins Guy Kawasaki to unpack why most arguments fail and how we can disagree without destroying relationships. They explore the psychology behind conflict, the surprising limits of body language, and the communication habits that make people feel heard. Julia also shares the HEAR framework from her new book, How to Disagree Better, offering practical ways to handle difficult conversations at work, at home, and online. If you’ve ever walked away from an argument wishing it had gone differently, this episode will change the way you communicate. -- Guy Kawasaki is on a mission to make you remarkable. His Remarkable People podcast features interviews with remarkable people such as Jane Goodall, Marc Benioff, Woz, Kristi Yamaguchi, and Bob Cialdini. Every episode will make you more remarkable. With his decades of experience in Silicon Valley as a Venture Capitalist and advisor to the top entrepreneurs in the world, Guy’s questions come from a place of curiosity and passion for technology, start-ups, entrepreneurship, and marketing. If you love society and culture, documentaries, and business podcasts, take a second to follow Remarkable People. Listeners of the Remarkable People podcast will learn from some of the most successful people in the world with practical tips and inspiring stories that will help you be more remarkable. Episodes of Remarkable People organized by topic: https://bit.ly/rptopology Listen to Remarkable People here: ** https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/guy-kawasakis-remarkable-people/id1483081827** Produced by Madisun Nuismer and Jeff Sieh . Research provided by Tessa Nuismer

Send Wilk a text with your feedback! (incoming msgs only - I can't reply) Julia Minson has spent 25 years studying disagreement—not how to win arguments, but how people actually engage with views that conflict with their own. She’s a Harvard professor, a behavioral scientist, and the author of How to Disagree Better . This conversation gets into the heart of her research. One of the most useful ideas in the episode: being receptive in your own head doesn’t count. Your counterpart can’t read your mind. If you want them to feel heard, you have to signal it out loud—with specific language, in real time. Julia’s HEAR framework (Hedging, Emphasizing agreement, Acknowledging, Reframing) gives you an actual tool to do that. We also get into why asking “why do you believe that” changes a conversation more than almost anything else—and why so much of the enmity in our society isn’t really about what people believe, but about what we assume their beliefs say about them. If you’ve ever walked away from a hard conversation feeling like the other person wasn’t really listening—or wondering if you were—this episode is worth your time. Julia’s book is How to Disagree Better , and you can find her at disagreeingbetter.com. Learn more about and connect with Julia Minson in the full show notes for this episode at www.DeratetheHate.com. AllSides Student Journalism Award application process is open now! AllSides, a national leader in balanced news and media bias ratings, is awarding three students with Five Hundred Dollars for reporting on all sides of an issue. It's open to any student in any type of school, grades K through 16. Deadline to submit is December 31st. 👉🏻Check it out at allsides.com/dth-award . The world is a better place if we are better people. Be grateful for all you’ve got. Make every day the day that you want it to be! Please follow the DTH podcast on: Facebook , Instagram , Twitter(X) , YouTube , Substack Subscribe to us wherever you enjoy your audio or from our site. Please leave us a rating and feedback on Apple podcasts or other platforms. You can share your thoughts or request Wilk for a speaking engagement on our contact page: DerateTheHate.com/Contact The Derate The Hate podcast is proudly produced in collaboration with Braver Angels — America’s largest grassroots, cross-partisan organization working toward civic renewal and bridging partisan divides. Learn more: BraverAngels.org Welcome to the Derate The Hate Podcast! *The views expressed by Wilk, his guest hosts &/or guests on the Derate The Hate podcast are their own and should not be attributed to any organization they may otherwise be affiliated with.

If you’ve ever ended an argument with your partner, coworker, or family member feeling confused about how it escalated so quickly, this episode is for you. Julia Minson , founder of the Constructive Disagreement Lab and author of How to Disagree Better , explains to us why trying to “win” arguments often starts fights and offers a different metric for success: a disagreement that increases both people’s willingness to talk again. Drawing on her work on naive realism and research on receptiveness, she discusses why differences feel threatening, how listening is hard to perceive in conflict, and how language can signal receptivity using the HEAR framework. Listen in to learn evidence-based tools to make hard conversations in your life more constructive. Listen and Learn: Julia’s upbringing in a family of psychologists, her immigrant experience, and her years as a ballroom dancer, and why people can share the same moment yet see it completely differently, making disagreement inevitable Why a truly constructive disagreement isn’t about “winning” or changing minds, but about improving mutual willingness to continue the conversation and deepening understanding Naive realism and the tendency to assume our perceptions are objectively correct, which underlies everyday conflicts, because everyone thinks “I get it” and struggles to see others’ perspectives How true receptiveness works, not just thinking receptively, but expressing it clearly through language so others genuinely feel heard, especially in conflict or disagreement How to use the HEAR framework to communicate receptively and build stronger relationships Julia’s Hawk story and how approaching disagreements with curiosity rather than judgment can turn tense or potentially divisive moments into understanding, connection, and even common ground Resources: How to Disagree Better: https://bookshop.org/a/30734/9780593855003 Julia’s Websites: https://disagreeingbetter.com/ and https://www.juliaminson.com/ Connect with Julia on Social Media: https://www.linkedin.com/in/julia-minson-5b511b150/ https://twitter.com/juliaminson Take The Measure of Receptivity: https://receptiveness.net/survey.html About Julia Minson: Julia Minson is a professor of public policy at Harvard Kennedy School and founder of the Constructive Disagreement Lab, where she studies what she calls the "psychology of disagreement" — how we actually engage with views that conflict with our own, especially on the hot-button stuff: politics, values, health decisions. Her new book, How to Disagree Better , starts from a counterintuitive premise: we're drowning in advice on how to win arguments, but Julia's research shows that trying to win is basically a guaranteed way to start a fight. Her work offers evidence-based strategies for being genuinely receptive to opposing views, which turns out to be far more effective than perfecting your

Join us for a fascinating conversation with Dr. Julia Minson, a Professor of Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School and a leading decision scientist. Dr. Minson's research addresses the psychology of disagreement—how and why we engage with views that conflict with our own. She shares data-driven insights and practical tools, including the HEAR Framework, to move past negative conflict and harness the incredible value found in diverse perspectives. Discover how to transform disagreements into opportunities for learning, better decision-making, and stronger professional relationships. Key Insights from This Episode: The difference between Disagreement and Conflict: Why disagreement is valuable and how it devolves into destructive conflict. The Core Problem in Conversation: We spend far too much time conveying our own information and not enough time seeking to understand the other person's perspective. The "Unrealistic" Goal: Why persuading someone in a single conversation is rarely a realistic or productive objective. Alternative, Productive Goals: How to shift your intent from persuasion to learning, strengthening a relationship, or showcasing your competence. The Power of Acknowledgment: Learning the language to make your counterpart genuinely feel heard, which is critical for turning a destructive argument into a constructive conversation. The HEAR Framework: A four-step technique for conversational receptiveness, designed to build trust and maintain a positive exchange even when making your own point. The Vulnerability of Leadership: Why expressing curiosity and receptiveness makes you appear more competent, not less, and helps you become a more effective leader. Episode Timestamps – “Stand Up To Stand Out” (00:00) Intro (00:27) Dr. Julia Minson introduction (01:54) The universal nature of disagreement (02:50) Defining disagreement vs. conflict (05:54) Why persuasion is often the wrong goal (08:35) The power dynamic in conversations (10:45) Shifting the balance of time from conveying to seeking information (13:16) The value of considering context and setting ground rules (15:10) Intent vs. Perception: Power dynamics in the workplace (18:24) The importance of questioning your own assumptions (21:04) The need for safe forums for disagreement (23:17) Thinking about the goals of disagreement (persuasion, learning, relationship building) (26:30) Why seeking information (curiosity) is critical (29:33) The paradox of genuine curiosity (31:38) The HEAR framework for conversational receptiveness (33:16) H: Hedging (softening your language) (34:39) E: Emphasizing agreement (35:28) A: Acknowledgment (showing you heard their point) (37:25) R: Reframing (using positive language) (40:17) The connection between vulnerability and competent leadership (43:20) Why the skills of disagreement are critical for a complex world (45:00) Details on the book, How to Disagree Better Catch More From Our Guest – Dr. Julia Minson ‍ Dr. Julia Minson is a Professor of Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government, a decision scientist, and the founder of Disagreeing Better LLC. Book: How to Disagree Better (Available March 2026) LinkedIn: Julia Minson Website: https://www.google.com/search?q=julieminson.com Catch More From Our Host – Stuart Paap ️ Host of Stand Up to Stand Out, a podcast dedicated to empowering life sciences professionals to turn ideas into reality through insightful conversations on leadership, communication, and influence. LinkedIn: Stuart Paap Website: dnate.com Disclaimer: The views expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or positions of the host or this channel. This content is for entertainment and informational purposes

Celebrate our 250th episode with expert strategies that make tough conversations easier — and more meaningful. Some of the most meaningful shifts in how we communicate come from the moments that challenge us the most. In this special 250th episode of Think Fast Talk Smart , Matt Abrahams reflects on the insights that have shown him how conflict can become a catalyst for clarity, connection, and even compassion. From Amy Gallo’s reminder that the “right kind of conflict” leads to better outcomes to Jenn Wynn’s framework for calming our nervous system before stepping into a hard conversation and Julia Minson’s HEAR method for signaling genuine curiosity, each tool helps turn tension into understanding for every stage of conflict. And with Joseph Grenny’s guidance on noticing when our motives shift from problem-solving to winning, this episode highlights how self-awareness can reset even the toughest moments. Whether you’re navigating workplace disagreements or everyday friction at home, this milestone episode offers practical ways to make difficult dialogue feel less daunting — and a real opportunity to communicate better. Episode Reference Links: Amy Gallo Amy’s Book: Getting Along: How to Work With Anyone Ep.144 Communicating Through Conflict: How to Get Along with Anyone Jenn Wynn Jenn’s Podcast: The H.I. Note: Healing Inspirations from Life Ep.222 Discussing Through Discomfort: Why the Conversations You Avoid Cost You the Most Julia Minson Ep.136 The Art of Disagreeing Without Conflict: Navigating the Nuance Joseph Grenny Joseph’s Book: Crucial Conversations Ep.207 From Conflict to Connection: Having Crucial Conversat

Ten essential communication strategies designed to elevate your skills. 2024 has been an incredible year for learning and growth, and as we head into 2025, there’s no better time to reflect on the skills and strategies that can shape our communication and careers. In this special episode of Think Fast, Talk Smart , Matt Abrahams takes us through ten standout lessons from the past year. These aren’t just ideas to remember — they’re practices to evolve with. From Priya Parker’s insights on generous authority to Huggy Rao’s call to cut through jargon monoxide, each concept highlights how small shifts in mindset and behavior can lead to big transformations. With actionable advice and real-world examples, this episode is packed with inspiration to help you Think Fast, Talk Smart , and communicate better in the year ahead. Episode Reference Links: Ep.174 Fix Meetings: Transform Gatherings Into Meaningful Moments Ep.164 Using "Pre-suasion" to Influence Others Ep.158 Hope for Cynics: Building Trusting Relationships through Communication Ep.156 Creative Communication: How Our Design Choices Illustrate Our Values Ep.148 Conviction and Compassion: How to Have Hard Conversations Ep.142 Power and Persuasion: Live Insights from Stanford Experts Ep.137 When Words Aren’t Enough: How to Excel at Nonverbal Communication Ep.138 Speak Your Truth: Why Authenticity Leads to Better Communication Ep.134 How to Chat with Bots: The Secrets to Getting the Information You Need from AI Ep.131 Friction Fixing: How to Use Obstacles to Your Advantage Ep.120 A Few of Matt’s Fa

Disagreement and conflict may look the same on the surface, but the two concepts are, in fact, very different. According to Julia Minson , knowing how these notions differ is crucial to how you approach them. In this episode of Think Fast Talk Smart , Minson and strategic communication lecturer Matt Abrahams delve into the intricacies of conflict and disagreement. Minson, an associate professor of public policy at the Harvard Kennedy School and Stanford University alumna, also shares her expertise on decision-making and conflict negotiation. Minson emphasizes the need for genuine curiosity and receptiveness in communication to foster productive dialogue. Episode Reference Links: Julia Minson Ep.30 Dissolve Disagreements: How Communication Impacts Conflict Ep.72 Quick Thinks: Talk it Out - How to Successfully Negotiate and Resolve Conflict Connect: Premium Signup >>>> Think Fast Talk Smart Premium Email Questions & Feedback >>> hello@fastersmarter.io Episode Transcripts >>> Think Fast Talk Smart Website Newsletter Signup + English Language Learning >>> FasterSmarter.io Think Fast Talk Smart >>> LinkedIn , Instagram , YouTube Matt Abrahams >>> LinkedIn ******** Thank you to our sponsors. These partnerships support the ongoing production of the podcast, allowing us to bring it to you at no cost. Unleash your Superhuman potential with AI that meets you where you work. Learn more at superhuman.com Join our Think Fast Talk Smart Learning Community and become the communicator you want to be.

In this episode of The Decision Corner, Brooke discusses disagreement with Julia Minson, an Associate Professor of Public Policy at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and former lecturer at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Her research explores the psychology behind disagreement and collaboration — why we often suck at turning the former into the latter, and how we can be better. Brooke and Julia dissect the thought processes that often fuel our discussions, how discussions turn into arguments (particularly, unproductive ones), and the reasons we can’t seem to figure out why. Julia gives us practical interventions, applicable on a personal level, that can help us avoid the feared Thanksgiving dinner screaming match and other conversations like it. Specific topics include: Advocacy v.s. Inquiry mindset Why being a know-it-all is a problematic blindspot How to effectively signal open-mindedness Active listening: body language and verbal acknowledgement Cognitive misconceptions about our counterpart’s open-mindedness Scopes, baselines, and defaults The role of asking questions, and how to ask them with genuine curiosity Conversational receptiveness, intentional vocabulary, and the HEAR technique

Julia Minson studies the psychology of disagreement. In particular, she's been working to understand what sorts of people are receptive to other opinions and how our perceptions of other people's receptiveness can improve conversations. Dr. Minson is an Associate Professor of Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School of government. Some things that come up in this episode: StoryCorps and the One Small Step initiative (the clip at the beginning of the episode is from "Family Politics" ) For a big overview of the kinds of things we discuss, check out a recent review article about receptiveness by Julia and her colleague, Frances Chen (Minson & Chen, in press ) The effects of asking questions on receptiveness (Chen, Minson, & Tormala, 2010 ) Eye contact can foster resistance to persuasion (Chen, Minson, Schöne, & Heinrichs, 2013 ) Measuring receptiveness to opposing views as a personal trait (Minson, Chen, & Tinsley, 2019 ) Developing an algorithm to detect receptiveness using language (Yeomans, Minson, et al., 2020 ) For a transcript of this episode, visit: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episode/receptiveness-with-julia-minson/ Check out my new audio course on Knowable : "The Science of Persuasion." Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter. Join me over at Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/OpinionScience Learn more about Opinion Science and catch up on all the episodes at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ .